14 God Supports Slavery: And it Was the Same as American Slavery

chains

In the Bible, God defined rules for slavery that made biblical slavery basically identical to American slavery.

The United States had two kinds of servitude. With indentured servitude, Europeans would come to America to work for fellow Europeans. Masters paid for their servants’ transportation, and they provided food, clothes, shelter, and training. In return, the servants were usually obliged to work for five years. Roughly half of the European immigrants to the thirteen colonies came as indentured servants.

The other form of servitude was chattel (ownership) slavery. These slaves were rarely Europeans, and they remained slaves for life, as did any children.

The Old Testament defined the same two categories. Fellow Jews could be slaves, but only for a limited time. God said, “If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years. But in the seventh year, he shall go free.”

Many Christians have heard that this indentured servitude is the extent of biblical slavery. This ignores the other kind, about which God says, “Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you. . . . You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life.”

God approved of slavery in the same way he approved of commerce—by regulation. The book of Proverbs admonishes merchants to use fair weights and measures. God’s regulation of commerce makes clear that he approves of it when honestly done, and his many rules about slavery make clear that he approves of that, too. For example, “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.”

Again, this sounds very much like slavery in America, which also had rules to “civilize” it. For example, the 1833 Alabama law code stated, “Any person who shall maliciously dismember or deprive a slave of life, shall suffer such punishment as would be inflicted in case the like offence had been committed on a free white person.”

Christians may defend God by saying that social conditions of the time constrained him, though God didn’t feel bound by the status quo when he imposed the Ten Commandments. They weren’t the Ten Suggestions, and the death penalty backed most of them. If God had room for “Don’t covet,” surely he could find room for “Don’t enslave anyone.” Slavery clearly wasn’t a problem to God in the Bible.

Another response is that Christians helped abolish slavery in the West. That’s true, but the Bible was a tool for Christians on both sides of the issue. During the American Civil War, some in the South argued that abolitionists were apostates for denying the clear meaning of the Bible.

Granted, slavery was common in the Ancient Near East, but surely an all-wise god can rise above manmade customs. That God sanctioned slavery that was as degrading as American slavery makes God look no wiser than a character in a manmade myth.

Continue to chapter 15.

Image credit: Miltiadis Fragkidis on Unsplash

Notes

Ancient Near East: the region that roughly corresponds to the modern Middle East from the beginning of civilization in Sumer through the Bronze and Iron Ages. It includes the Egyptian, Akkadian, Phoenician, Babylonian, Assyrian, and Israelite civilizations and more.

“If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years”: Exodus 21:2.

“Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you”: Leviticus 25:44–6.

The book of Proverbs admonishes merchants to use fair weights and measures: Proverbs makes this demand four times: in verses 11:1, 16:11, 20:10, and 20:23.

“Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod”: Exodus 21:20–21.

“Any person who shall maliciously dismember or deprive a slave of life”: Alabama slave code of 1833, http://www.archives.state.al.us/teacher/slavery/lesson1/doc1-3.html, section 3.

the death penalty backed most of them: For breaking the first commandment against worshipping another god, see Exodus 22:20. For idols, Exodus 32:27. For blasphemy, Leviticus 24:16. For not keeping the sabbath day holy, Exodus. 31:15. For dishonoring parents, Leviticus 20:9. For killing, Exodus 21:12. For adultery, Leviticus 20:10. For lying, Proverbs 19:9. Stealing and coveting did not always have a death penalty.

“Don’t covet”: Exodus 20:17.

abolitionists were infidels for denying the clear meaning of the Bible: Mark A. Noll, America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (Oxford University Press: 2002), 640.

5 thoughts on “14 God Supports Slavery: And it Was the Same as American Slavery

  1. Pingback: 13 Argument from Design: Life Is Marvelously Complicated, but Does that Mean it Was Designed? | 2-Minute Christianity

  2. There are a lot of disturbing passages in the old testament that are a confession of how people thought thousands of years ago. This is a testament to how honest the writers of the books of Bible were or they would have removed this.

    You would have to search far and wide for a modern church or synagogue extreme enough to interpret the Bible this way. Is it hard to understand that “God” in this case is only there to discourage it being easily questioned?

    Like

    • “There are a lot of disturbing passages in the old testament that are a confession of how people thought thousands of years ago. This is a testament to how honest the writers of the books of Bible were or they would have removed this.”

      Huh? If I said, “I saw my neighbor drive his car,” would you marvel at how honest I am? Of course not.

      Similarly, why marvel at the OT authors or God saying that slavery, genocide, and human sacrifice are fine? Everyone thought that back then.

      “You would have to search far and wide for a modern church or synagogue extreme enough to interpret the Bible this way.”

      Yeah, and? Thank goodness at least *some* of the crazy stuff is no longer in vogue.

      “Is it hard to understand that “God” in this case is only there to discourage it being easily questioned?”

      What’s hard to understand, I’m afraid, is this question.

      Like

      • The material difference of you watching your neighbor drive his car with an ancient leader in control of the narrative admitting to a massacre is rather interesting. I have to wonder what your neighbor is up to?

        Yeah, thank goodness some of the crazy is no longer popular. I’m hoping we can get ahead of the problems related to the collapse of globalization and climate change or we will see lots of bad news from abroad. This seems to be a merry game of rock-paper-scissors as I have technology talks with my very liberal interfaith peers, secular discussions with my more fundamentalist leaning conservative peers, and highly religious discussions with my atheistic peers. Oh that aliens have been watching us develop for thousands of years to satisfy their boredom with a reality show and we can someday get some answers.

        Until then I will point out that in my experience, only fundamentalists and atheists seem to care about the passages you site supporting slavery, genocide, and human sacrifice. I have to wonder if there is a symbiotic relationship as one extreme inspires the other in a repeated cycle with me being witness and ignored by both. Possibly the most valuable thing I learned in childhood was “be cool and roll with it”.

        Do you have a blog discussing cool technology like sodium ion batteries, innovations in high voltage DC power transmission, genetically engineered pigs for replacement organs and blood, agrivoltaics with robots, brine water aquaculture, and well things that inspire hope for the future?

        Like

  3. “Until then I will point out that in my experience, only fundamentalists and atheists seem to care about the passages you site supporting slavery, genocide, and human sacrifice.”

    Yes, that seems to be the case. It is puzzling that conservative Christians will read about God supporting slavery (to take one example) and not let that get in the way of their unevidenced supernatural beliefs. My book is directed at Christians who are curious or whose faith is flagging.

    “Possibly the most valuable thing I learned in childhood was “be cool and roll with it”.”

    I interpret this to mean that you just wall off aspects of Christianity that make you feel bad. This allows you to keep the Christian beliefs you like. Is that right?

    “Do you have a blog discussing cool technology like sodium ion batteries, innovations in high voltage DC power transmission, genetically engineered pigs for replacement organs and blood, agrivoltaics with robots, brine water aquaculture, and well things that inspire hope for the future?”

    I did write a book “Future Hype: The Myths of Technology Change,” but that’s not quite what you’re talking about.

    Like

Leave a comment